forked from zhoulin/zl_bench
Three pieces from the fork's feature/musa-benchmark-support branch that never reached main, rebased onto the backend abstraction rather than copied verbatim. _musa_benchmark_compat_plugin drops FlagGems benchmark skip guards written as `torch.cuda.is_available()` where the code under test dispatches through flag_gems.device. On MThreads those turn a working operator into "not measured": test_fft.py skipped entirely, and unskipped on an S5000 it produces 25 rows. The plugin pins each override to one file and one exact skip reason and only acts when flag_gems has dispatched to the mthreads vendor; two guards were probed on device and deliberately left in place, which is why they are named in its docstring rather than silently absent. It is wired through a new DeviceBackend.compat_plugins rather than a name test in the planner, so the policy stays where every other backend difference lives. Compat plugins are planned first because they rewrite collection-time markers and nothing may read the item list before them; a test pins that position and another pins that they do not leak to other backends. batch_summary gains --ab: the speedup column compares gems against torch, not one build against another, so an A/B needs the two run.logs paired by operator, dtype and size detail. Only rows that succeeded on both sides with a positive latency count, so an incomplete pairing cannot look like a complete range, and the range is annotated when either side carries a BENCHMARK_DIRECT_NO_CUDAGRAPH marker, since a fallback row was timed under a different regime. ab_rlc_test.sh is the same caliber as ab_fold_test.sh with the comparison axis moved to FLAGTREE_<VENDOR>_RLC_ENHANCE. Both are caliber examples, not regression scripts: if the switch under test no longer exists the script still runs every round and prints a full table showing no difference, so confirm the axis is live before reusing either. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>